A charity CRO agency helps nonprofits increase donations without resorting to manipulation. Learn what ethical optimisation looks like for the sector.
The UK charity sector faces a paradox. Total giving reached an estimated £15.4 billion in 2024, yet the number of people donating has fallen to just 50 percent of adults, the lowest level since records began in 2016. Charities find themselves competing harder for a shrinking pool of supporters whilst simultaneously dealing with rising operational costs and increased demand for services. In this environment, working with a specialist charity CRO agency becomes less about marginal gains and more about survival.
Conversion rate optimisation for charities operates under different rules than commercial ecommerce. Donors are not customers in the transactional sense. They receive nothing tangible in return for their money except the knowledge that they have contributed to a cause they believe in. This psychological dynamic demands an approach to optimisation that respects the donor relationship rather than exploiting it. The tactics that might work for selling trainers will actively damage a charity's ability to build the long-term supporter relationships it needs to thrive.
This guide examines what effective conversion rate optimisation looks like for UK charities, why specialist expertise matters, and how to distinguish agencies that genuinely understand the sector from those simply applying commercial playbooks.
The donation page conversion rate for nonprofits averages around 12 percent according to the M+R Benchmarks 2025 study. On desktop devices, this rises to 11 percent, while mobile conversion sits at just 8 percent. These figures represent a significant opportunity cost. For every 100 visitors to a donation page, 88 leave without giving. Even modest improvements to this conversion rate translate directly into additional funds for the charitable mission.
Yet the opportunity comes with substantial risk. The charity sector holds a privileged position in public trust, with 57 percent of people expressing high confidence in charities according to the Charity Commission's 2025 research. This places charities second only to doctors in terms of trustworthiness. Aggressive or manipulative optimisation tactics threaten this trust in ways that commercial businesses simply do not face.
Consider the false urgency tactics common in ecommerce: countdown timers, claims of limited availability, or warnings about prices increasing. Applied to a donation page, these approaches feel manipulative because they are manipulative. They work against the emotional journey a donor is on, replacing genuine connection with pressure. A charity CRO agency that imports these tactics wholesale demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the sector.
The digital skills gap compounds these challenges. The Charity Digital Skills Report 2024 found that 41 percent of charities rated themselves as poor at digital fundraising, while 72 percent cited squeezed finances as their biggest barrier to digital progress. Many charities lack the internal capacity to run rigorous experimentation programmes, making external expertise essential. But that expertise must come from practitioners who understand both the technical discipline of CRO and the ethical considerations specific to the voluntary sector.
A charity donation page occupies unusual territory in web design. It must communicate impact, build confidence, minimise friction, and handle payment processing, all while respecting the emotional state of someone about to make a voluntary financial commitment. The M+R Benchmarks 2025 study reveals that 64 percent of nonprofits default their donation pages to one-time giving, despite monthly gifts now representing 31 percent of online revenue and growing faster than one-time donations.
This single finding illustrates why specialist optimisation matters. A commercial CRO practitioner might test button colours or form field labels. A charity CRO agency understands that the default selection between one-time and monthly giving has profound implications for both immediate conversion and long-term donor value. Pre-selecting monthly giving has been shown to increase conversions of recurring donations by up to 35 percent, yet the decision about whether to implement this must balance short-term gains against donor experience and perception.
Mobile optimisation presents particular challenges. More than half of nonprofit website traffic now comes from mobile devices, yet desktop still generates 78 percent of online revenue. The gap between mobile traffic share and mobile revenue share represents donors who arrive on their phones but cannot complete the donation process comfortably. A specialist agency will prioritise mobile form design, payment integration, and page speed, knowing that these technical factors directly determine whether interested supporters become active donors.
Payment method availability also influences conversion. PayPal remains the most widely used alternative payment method, available on 76 percent of nonprofit donation pages. Apple Pay and Google Pay have lower adoption but remove friction for mobile users. A charity CRO agency will audit the payment options against the demographic profile of supporters and test the impact of adding or promoting different methods.
Effective charity optimisation extends far beyond the final transaction. The path from awareness to donation involves multiple touchpoints, each of which can either build momentum toward giving or create friction that derails the journey.
Email remains the primary digital fundraising channel, yet revenue per thousand fundraising emails declined by 20 percent in 2024 even as charities sent more messages. This indicates a saturation problem that quantity-focused strategies cannot solve. A charity CRO agency will examine email segmentation, timing, personalisation, and content strategy alongside landing page optimisation, understanding that the donation page cannot compensate for poorly targeted or excessive email communication.
Website navigation and information architecture influence conversion in ways that are often invisible until analysed. Supporters who cannot quickly understand a charity's impact or find answers to their questions about where donations go may never reach the donation page at all. The 2024 Charity Commission research highlighted that donations reaching the end cause and the purpose of the charity being achieved are the most important factors in whether people trust and support a charity. If website content fails to communicate this clearly, conversion suffers regardless of how well-optimised the donation form might be.
The thank you page and post-donation communication represent an overlooked optimisation opportunity. Donor retention rates average around 18 percent, meaning the vast majority of new donors never give again. Immediate post-donation engagement sets expectations and begins the relationship-building process that determines whether a first-time donor becomes a regular supporter. Existing donors are far more likely to give again than new donors, with retention rates of 62 percent for existing supporters compared to just 23 percent for new-to-file donors.
Commercial CRO typically focuses on revenue per visitor, average order value, and conversion rate. These metrics matter for charities too, but they tell an incomplete story. A specialist charity CRO agency will develop measurement frameworks that capture the full picture of supporter engagement whilst avoiding the trap of optimising for metrics that look good in reports but fail to advance the charitable mission.
Lifetime value matters more in the charity sector than in most commercial contexts. A donor who gives £10 monthly for three years is worth significantly more than a donor who makes a single £100 gift, even before accounting for the reduced acquisition costs of retention. Optimisation decisions that maximise immediate conversion at the expense of long-term relationship quality may appear successful in the short term while undermining sustainable fundraising. This dynamic becomes particularly important when evaluating test results. A variant that increases conversion rate by 15 percent but attracts donors less likely to give again may actually damage long-term revenue.
Average gift size provides important context for conversion rate changes. The M+R Benchmarks 2025 study found that the average one-time gift rose to £126 in 2024, recovering from a dip the previous year. Monthly gifts averaged around £46. If conversion optimisation inadvertently reduces average gift size, the net effect on revenue may be negative even if more people complete donations. A responsible agency will track both metrics and investigate trade-offs between them. They will also segment analysis by traffic source, device type, and campaign, recognising that different audiences may respond differently to the same optimisation.
Cost per acquisition becomes increasingly relevant as charities invest more in digital advertising. Total advertising investment by nonprofits increased by 11 percent in 2024. If landing pages and donation forms fail to convert the traffic that advertising brings, the return on ad spend suffers. Connected TV advertising grew by 84 percent and now represents 15 percent of fundraising advertising budgets, bringing new audiences to charity websites who may have different expectations and behaviours than organic visitors. A specialist agency will connect advertising analytics with website behaviour data to understand which channels deliver the best quality supporters, not just the highest initial volumes.
Attribution modelling presents unique challenges for charities. The journey from first awareness to first donation may span months and involve multiple touchpoints across channels. A supporter might discover a charity through social media, receive emails for several weeks, read news coverage of the charity's work, and finally donate after receiving a direct mail piece. Crediting the donation solely to the final touchpoint misrepresents the contribution of earlier interactions. A charity CRO agency should understand these attribution complexities and help develop measurement approaches that inform good decision-making rather than rewarding whatever channel happened to be last.
The distinction between persuasion and manipulation deserves careful attention. Persuasion involves helping supporters understand impact, reducing unnecessary friction, and making the donation process as straightforward as possible. Manipulation involves exploiting psychological biases to pressure action that people might regret or that damages trust.
Transparency about donation allocation matters enormously to supporters. Only 12 percent of donors are comfortable with their donations contributing to the salary of a chief executive, according to CAF research, even though most understand that charities need professional leadership. A charity CRO agency will not recommend obscuring how donations are used, even if such obscurity might temporarily increase conversion. Instead, they will test approaches to presenting this information that maintain honesty while addressing donor concerns.
Suggested donation amounts influence giving but must be set responsibly. Pre-selecting very high amounts may increase average gift size but also increases abandonment and may attract donors who feel pressured rather than inspired. A specialist agency will test donation amount suggestions against multiple metrics including completion rate, average gift, and donor feedback.
Accessibility standards apply particularly strongly in the charity sector, given the demographic profile of donors and the ethical principles that underpin charitable work. Donation forms must work for users with visual impairments, motor difficulties, cognitive differences, and those using assistive technologies. An agency that does not audit for accessibility or test with diverse users is not providing comprehensive optimisation.
Experience within the sector provides essential context that cannot be quickly learned. An agency that has worked with animal welfare charities will understand the emotional intensity of that cause and the specific concerns of supporters. An agency that has optimised for health charities will know the sensitivities around illness, treatment, and mortality. An agency with experience in international development will appreciate the questions donors have about how their money reaches beneficiaries overseas. This contextual knowledge shapes every hypothesis, every test design, and every recommendation.
Methodology matters as much as results. Ask potential agencies how they generate hypotheses, how they prioritise tests, and how they determine when a test has reached statistical significance. Charities should be wary of agencies that promise specific percentage improvements before any analysis has been conducted. Real optimisation produces variable results because different organisations face different challenges. An honest agency will explain their process and set realistic expectations rather than guaranteeing outcomes they cannot control.
A credible agency will discuss test velocity honestly. Charity websites often lack the traffic volumes needed for rapid statistical significance. Running ten tests a month is rarely realistic for organisations outside the largest national charities. An agency that promises aggressive test roadmaps without understanding traffic limitations is likely to deliver inconclusive results or draw conclusions from inadequate data. For smaller charities, alternative approaches such as user research, expert review, and learning from sector benchmarks may deliver more reliable insights than underpowered A/B tests.
Integration with existing systems matters more than agencies sometimes acknowledge. Many charities use specific CRM platforms like Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud or Raiser's Edge, donation processors like JustGiving or Give as you Live, and email marketing tools like Mailchimp or Dotdigital. An agency should be able to work within these constraints rather than requiring wholesale platform changes before any optimisation can begin. They should also understand the data protection obligations that apply to charity donor data and ensure that all tracking and experimentation respects these requirements.
Knowledge transfer should be built into any engagement. Charities benefit most when agency expertise strengthens internal capability rather than creating dependency. A good agency will explain their reasoning, share templates and documentation, and leave the organisation better equipped to continue optimisation work after the formal engagement ends. Ask how the agency approaches training and documentation, and whether internal team members will be involved in test planning and analysis.
References from comparable organisations provide the most reliable indicator of fit. An agency may have impressive case studies from commercial clients, but the skills and approaches that succeed in ecommerce do not necessarily transfer to the charity sector. Ask specifically about work with nonprofits of similar size, cause area, and technical environment. Request permission to speak with previous clients directly rather than relying solely on written testimonials.
The challenges facing UK charities are structural and significant. Donor numbers continue to decline, young people are disengaging from traditional giving, and the economic environment remains difficult for discretionary spending. These are not problems that conversion rate optimisation alone can solve.
What CRO can do is ensure that charities maximise the value of every visitor who reaches their digital platforms. When someone arrives at a charity website with the intention to give, every unnecessary barrier, every confusing form field, every missing payment option represents a preventable loss to the charitable mission.
Working with a specialist charity CRO agency means accessing expertise that combines technical rigour with ethical sensitivity. It means testing approaches that other charities have proven to work, rather than learning from scratch. And it means freeing internal teams to focus on the strategic and creative work that brings supporters to the website in the first place.
At Another Web is Possible, we bring 15 years of optimisation experience to the charity sector. Our founder's previous work includes donation journey optimisation for The Donkey Sanctuary, delivering measurable improvements in supporter conversion whilst maintaining the trust that charity audiences rightly expect. Our approach rejects the manipulative tactics that damage donor relationships in favour of transparent, respectful optimisation that builds sustainable support. If you are looking for a charity CRO agency that shares your values, we would welcome a conversation about how we might work together.
(10).png)
(9).png)
(6).png)
(5).png)
(4).png)
(3).png)
(2).png)
(1).png)
.png)
.png)
(7).png)
.png)
