Showcase companies proving ethical practices drive business success. Discover positive examples that inspire and prove ethics and profitability can coexist.
The cynics say ethics and profit cannot coexist. They argue that treating customers fairly, paying workers properly, and respecting the environment are luxuries that competitive markets punish. The evidence says otherwise.
Across industries, companies that have embedded ethical principles into their operations are not merely surviving. They are outperforming competitors who chose manipulation over integrity. These are not fringe operations appealing only to the wealthy or ideologically committed. They are billion-pound businesses demonstrating that another way of doing things is not just possible but commercially superior.
This matters for conversion rate optimisation. The same logic that says dark patterns and manufactured urgency are necessary for conversions also says businesses must choose between ethics and growth. Both claims are wrong. The companies profiled here prove that respecting customers builds the trust that sustains long-term business success.
The 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer found that 81% of consumers need to trust a brand before buying from it. PwC's 2024 Voice of the Consumer Survey reported that 85% of customers will pay 9.7% more for sustainably sourced goods. Gen Z places 2.7 times more weight on brand values than older generations according to NielsenIQ research. The market is speaking clearly: ethics sell.
What follows are concrete examples of companies proving this thesis across different sectors. Not perfection, but genuine commitment that translates into commercial results.

Patagonia has become the reference case for purpose-driven business, and the numbers justify the attention.
In 2022, founder Yvon Chouinard transferred ownership of the company to the Holdfast Collective, a trust dedicated to fighting climate change. The company's mission statement declares: "We're in business to save our home planet." This is not marketing copy. It is operational reality.
The commercial results speak clearly. Patagonia generates over $1 billion annually, with $537 million coming from online sales alone in 2024. In 2011, Patagonia ran a Black Friday ad telling customers "Don't Buy This Jacket." Instead of hurting sales, revenue increased 30% the following year, jumping from $415 million to $543 million. The company's sales have quadrupled over the past decade.
The B Corp Impact Assessment, which measures a company's entire social and environmental performance, assigns a median score of 50.9 to certified companies. Patagonia scored 151.4.
Patagonia's approach extends throughout operations. From Spring 2025 and onward, 100% of their new styles are made without intentionally added PFAS. More than 90% of the products in their line are made in a Fair Trade Certified factory. 85,000+ workers benefit from Patagonia's participation in the Fair Trade program. The company publishes details of every organisation it finances through environmental giving, having donated over $140 million to grassroots environmental groups since 1985.
What makes Patagonia instructive is not perfection but honesty. As Chouinard told McKinsey: "We can't delude ourselves into thinking that anything we or any other business does is 'sustainable'. The best we can do is minimize the harm we do to the planet." The company's 2025 Work in Progress Report explicitly frames itself as transparency rather than victory.
The lesson: authenticity cannot be faked. Patagonia created something genuine that became so profitable, it attracted an army of counterfeits. Other companies attempted to replicate results without replicating values. The customers noticed. In a market saturated with greenwashing, verified ethics becomes competitive advantage.

37signals, makers of Basecamp and HEY, demonstrate a different form of ethical business: the rejection of growth-at-all-costs culture in favour of sustainable profitability.
By 2024, Basecamp's revenue reached approximately $280 million with around 252,000 customers. The company has been profitable for over two decades, has never taken venture capital beyond a small early investment from Jeff Bezos, and operates with roughly 70 employees.
The philosophy is explicit. As the company states: "For over two decades, we've been outspoken about running a profitable, financially responsible company in an industry that has become incredibly proficient at losing buckets of money. While everyone else was celebrating burning cash, we chose profit instead."
This approach creates genuine stability. "Remember 2008? 2009? The nuclear winters of funding? Those were some of our best years! Profits insulated us from jittery investors, and our customers still kept paying for Basecamp." When the 2022 bear market arrived and competitors faced stock prices down 90%, 37signals had no explaining to do.
The ethical dimension extends to treatment of employees and customers. 37signals practices "8/8/8": eight hours of work, eight hours of personal time, and eight hours of sleep. The company advocates for "burying the hustle" and believes that "small is often plenty." Customers fund daily operations directly by paying for products; the company answers to them, not investors or boards.
Transparency is structural. 37signals publishes prices directly on its site, the same regardless of who you are. No hidden enterprise pricing, no sales negotiations, no manipulation.
The model proves that technology companies need not choose between ethics and commercial success. In August 2025, 37signals open-sourced Campfire under an MIT licence, continuing a pattern of contributing to the broader community through tools like Ruby on Rails.

Triodos Bank demonstrates that financial services can operate profitably while maintaining rigorous ethical standards.
Founded in 1980, Triodos has grown to manage €24.1 billion in assets across Europe while maintaining strict principles about what it will and will not finance. The bank delivered positive impact to society through EUR 24.1 billion of total assets under management directed towards its five transition themes (energy, food, resources, society and wellbeing), with a growth of EUR 905 million in 2024.
The numbers reflect sustainable growth alongside ethical commitment. Triodos Bank financed 561 sustainable energy projects in 2024, contributing to the avoidance of 997 ktonnes of CO2e emissions. The bank has been named Best Ethical Financial Provider at the British Bank Awards for four consecutive years.
What distinguishes Triodos is transparency about financing decisions. The bank's "Minimum Standards" policy lays out, in great detail, the principles guiding which type of institutions and sectors Triodos will finance. It publishes an annual list of every loan it makes, something no traditional UK bank does. Customers can see exactly where their deposits go.
The bank's approach acknowledges complexity without abandoning principles. CEO Jeroen Rijpkema stated: "Despite the turbulence in the world around us, we can look back on 2024 as a year of resilience of, and progress for, Triodos Bank, demonstrating that good financial performance, adequate risk management and positive impact can go hand in hand."
As of 2025, Triodos Bank managed around 750,000 customer accounts in Europe. The bank's commitment to funding renewable energy, organic farming, and social enterprises has built a customer base that actively chooses ethical banking over marginally higher interest rates elsewhere.

Monzo demonstrates how radical transparency and customer respect can disrupt entrenched industries.
Monzo generated $1.67B in revenue in fiscal year 2025, up 48% from the previous year. Total customer deposits grew 48% to $22.4B, while their total number of customers grew 25% from 9.7M to 12.2M. The bank achieved adjusted profits of £113.9 million, up from £13.9 million in the previous year.
The growth comes from treating customers fairly rather than exploiting confusion. Transparency is a core principle at Monzo. Customers receive clear, upfront details about all charges. The bank avoids hidden fees and offers fair pricing for services such as overdrafts, loans, and foreign transactions.
Traditional banks generated significant revenue through opaque fee structures, hidden charges, and complex terms designed to confuse rather than inform. Monzo built its business on the opposite principle. Real-time notifications show customers exactly what they spend. Budgeting tools help them manage money rather than overspend. Overdraft pricing is clear and consistent.
The customer advocacy metrics reflect this approach. Monzo has a Net Promoter Score of +70, while the industry average is 30. 66% of new customers join through recommendations, with customers having an average of 38 friends who also use Monzo.
In 2016, Monzo raised £1 million in 96 seconds from customers eager to own a part of the bank. Growth has come almost entirely through word of mouth, built on a foundation of genuine trust.
The bank now offers products spanning current accounts, savings, lending, investments, pensions, and business banking. Monzo was recently crowned 'Best British Bank' and ranked number one for Overall Service Quality in the independent Competition and Markets Authority survey.

IKEA demonstrates that global retail scale and sustainability can coexist.
Ingka Group (the largest IKEA retailer) achieved EUR 41.5 billion in revenue in FY2025. While serving customers at this scale, the company has systematically reduced its environmental footprint. IKEA made progress towards its climate goals, reducing total emissions by 5% compared to the previous year and 28% compared to FY16.
The approach is comprehensive. IKEA is investing in recycled plastics, biobased materials and circular textiles. Phasing out single-use plastics falls within waste reduction goals, including having half of all materials renewable or recycled by 2025. Ikea's investment arm will invest more than $1.03 billion into recycling infrastructure companies, including for plastic goods and mattresses.
The circular economy model extends to customer interaction. A growing number of IKEA markets buy back IKEA furniture from customers who no longer need it and re-sell these good-quality second-hand items in the As-Is areas in stores. In FY24, IKEA U.S. increased products eligible to be bought back and resold in-store and online to 2,700 items.
What makes IKEA's approach notable is the integration of sustainability with affordability. Keeping prices on "sustainable living" goods low helps that effort. To that end, Ingka Group invested $2.16 billion in thousands of products, from heat pumps in Sweden to solar panels in California, in the 2024 financial year.
IKEA has successfully decoupled its financial growth from its greenhouse gas emissions output. The company proves that sustainability at scale is operationally achievable, not merely aspirational.

Lush Cosmetics made a decision that seemed commercially suicidal: leaving major social media platforms entirely.
In a beauty industry obsessed with algorithms, ads, and endless engagement, Lush chose to go radically offline. The company quit Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok, citing concerns about platform effects on mental health and wellbeing.
The commercial impact was notable for its absence of disaster. The brand accepted a $13 million projected financial risk. Still pulled in £41.8 million in UK December sales, its best in two years. Physical store sales rose +54.4% year over year.
Lush's total revenue reached £690.1 million for the fiscal year 2024. The company operates over 850 stores in more than 45 countries. 76% of website visitors are female, with 25-34 year olds leading the way.
The ethical stance extends throughout operations. Lush maintains commitment to paying above government minimum wage in all group markets. In North America, Lush committed to a base pay of $15 per hour across the US and Canada, increasing rates across 226 shops in 54 states and provinces.
Lush relaunched its website and app in collaboration with Saleor, utilising open source solutions to scale global commerce operations while strengthening commitment to digital ethics. The company champions ethical hardware, digital rights, and open source technology alongside its cosmetics business.
The lesson: customers reward genuine conviction. Lush's "no advertising policy" relies on product quality and word of mouth. The company does not spend money on TV campaigns or celebrity endorsements, and instead relies heavily on user-generated content. In an industry built on manufactured aspiration, Lush proves that authenticity can sustain a global brand.
Beyond individual company examples, the regulatory environment is formalising what these companies understood intuitively: manipulation is bad business.
Dark patterns, those deceptive design choices that nudge people into taking actions they might not freely choose, are now banned across the European Union. The Digital Services Act (DSA), effective since 2024, explicitly prohibits a range of these tactics.
The scope is comprehensive. Major players like X (formerly Twitter), Meta, Shein, Temu, TikTok, and AliExpress are under scrutiny for allegedly breaching DSA requirements, including accusations of using dark patterns. Fines incurred under the DSA alone can amount up to 6% of global turnover, and fines can reach up to 7% under the AI Act.
The Digital Fairness Act, expected in 2025, deals with manipulative and unethical commercial practices like the widespread use of dark patterns. It will address influencer marketing, addictive designs, personalised pricing according to tracking and profiling, video games currency, and other challenges for consumers.
Consumer protection authorities are increasingly punishing businesses that use dark patterns. In Poland, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection has so far issued six decisions explicitly identifying practices as dark patterns, imposing nearly PLN 40 million in fines. In July 2024, the UK CMA obliged Wowcher to refund more than GBP 4 million to customers harmed by dark patterns.
The 2024 International Consumer Protection and Enforcement Network (ICPEN) and Global Privacy Enforcement Network (GPEN) sweep of 642 traders found that 75.7% deployed at least one dark pattern, and 66.8% employed two or more dark patterns.
The direction is clear: practices that the companies profiled here never adopted are becoming legally prohibited. Ethical design is becoming mandatory, not merely optional.
Several patterns emerge across these examples.
Transparency as competitive advantage. Every company profiled makes information freely available that competitors hide. Triodos publishes every loan. Monzo shows every fee upfront. Patagonia details its supply chain. This transparency builds trust that competitors cannot easily replicate.
Long-term thinking over short-term extraction. 37signals chose profitability over growth at all costs. IKEA invested billions in circular infrastructure. Patagonia gave itself away to ensure mission permanence. These decisions sacrifice potential short-term gains for sustainable long-term success.
Respect for customers as intelligent adults. None of these companies rely on confusion, manipulation, or psychological exploitation. They assume customers can make informed decisions when given accurate information. This respect is reciprocated through loyalty and advocacy.
Integration of values throughout operations. Ethics is not a marketing layer applied to conventional business practices. Values inform product development, pricing, employment, supply chains, and customer relationships. The consistency makes claims credible.
Willingness to accept constraints. Each company accepts limitations that competitors reject. Triodos will not finance certain sectors. Lush will not use certain platforms. Patagonia tells customers not to buy its products. These constraints feel like disadvantages but function as differentiation.
These examples carry direct implications for conversion rate optimisation practice.
The argument for dark patterns, manufactured urgency, and manipulative design rests on the assumption that short-term conversion lifts justify long-term trust erosion. The companies profiled here prove the opposite: genuine customer respect builds businesses that outperform manipulative competitors.
When the 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer shows that trust is as much of a purchase consideration as quality and price, the commercial case for ethical CRO becomes undeniable. 87% of consumers will pay more for products from brands they trust. Building that trust requires rejecting the quick wins that destroy it.
The regulatory environment is formalising this logic. Practices that seemed like acceptable optimisation techniques are becoming legal liabilities. For businesses operating in the EU, the prohibitions on dark patterns under the DMA, DSA, and AI Act mean that compliance is no longer optional.
The companies that got there first, that built ethical practices into their foundations before regulation required it, now hold structural advantages. Their customer relationships are built on trust rather than manipulation. Their systems do not require redesign to comply with new requirements. Their brand associations are positive rather than contested.
Another web is possible. Another approach to business is possible. These companies prove it.
The cynical assumption that ethics and profit cannot coexist dissolves in the face of billion-pound businesses built on transparency, respect, and genuine value creation. The assumption that customers need manipulation to convert dissolves when companies built on honesty achieve industry-leading growth.
AWIP exists to help businesses apply these principles to their digital presence. Conversion rate optimisation that respects users is not idealistic sacrifice. It is sustainable competitive advantage. The evidence is clear. The regulatory environment is shifting. The choice is yours.
If you want to build a digital presence that treats customers as intelligent adults, that optimises for long-term trust rather than short-term manipulation, get in touch.